Goto

Collaborating Authors

 neural information processing system track




International Scientific Report on the Safety of Advanced AI (Interim Report)

Bengio, Yoshua, Mindermann, Sören, Privitera, Daniel, Besiroglu, Tamay, Bommasani, Rishi, Casper, Stephen, Choi, Yejin, Goldfarb, Danielle, Heidari, Hoda, Khalatbari, Leila, Longpre, Shayne, Mavroudis, Vasilios, Mazeika, Mantas, Ng, Kwan Yee, Okolo, Chinasa T., Raji, Deborah, Skeadas, Theodora, Tramèr, Florian, Adekanmbi, Bayo, Christiano, Paul, Dalrymple, David, Dietterich, Thomas G., Felten, Edward, Fung, Pascale, Gourinchas, Pierre-Olivier, Jennings, Nick, Krause, Andreas, Liang, Percy, Ludermir, Teresa, Marda, Vidushi, Margetts, Helen, McDermid, John A., Narayanan, Arvind, Nelson, Alondra, Oh, Alice, Ramchurn, Gopal, Russell, Stuart, Schaake, Marietje, Song, Dawn, Soto, Alvaro, Tiedrich, Lee, Varoquaux, Gaël, Yao, Andrew, Zhang, Ya-Qin

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

I am honoured to be chairing the delivery of the inaugural International Scientific Report on Advanced AI Safety. I am proud to publish this interim report which is the culmination of huge efforts by many experts over the six months since the work was commissioned at the Bletchley Park AI Safety Summit in November 2023. We know that advanced AI is developing very rapidly, and that there is considerable uncertainty over how these advanced AI systems might affect how we live and work in the future. AI has tremendous potential to change our lives for the better, but it also poses risks of harm. That is why having this thorough analysis of the available scientific literature and expert opinion is essential. The more we know, the better equipped we are to shape our collective destiny.


A Systematic Review of NeurIPS Dataset Management Practices

Wu, Yiwei, Ajmani, Leah, Longpre, Shayne, Li, Hanlin

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

As new machine learning methods demand larger training datasets, researchers and developers face significant challenges in dataset management. Although ethics reviews, documentation, and checklists have been established, it remains uncertain whether consistent dataset management practices exist across the community. This lack of a comprehensive overview hinders our ability to diagnose and address fundamental tensions and ethical issues related to managing large datasets. We present a systematic review of datasets published at the NeurIPS Datasets and Benchmarks track, focusing on four key aspects: provenance, distribution, ethical disclosure, and licensing. Our findings reveal that dataset provenance is often unclear due to ambiguous filtering and curation processes. Additionally, a variety of sites are used for dataset hosting, but only a few offer structured metadata and version control. These inconsistencies underscore the urgent need for standardized data infrastructures for the publication and management of datasets.


Deep Generative Models for Offline Policy Learning: Tutorial, Survey, and Perspectives on Future Directions

Chen, Jiayu, Ganguly, Bhargav, Xu, Yang, Mei, Yongsheng, Lan, Tian, Aggarwal, Vaneet

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Deep generative models (DGMs) have demonstrated great success across various domains, particularly in generating texts, images, and videos using models trained from offline data. Similarly, data-driven decision-making and robotic control also necessitate learning a generator function from the offline data to serve as the strategy or policy. In this case, applying deep generative models in offline policy learning exhibits great potential, and numerous studies have explored in this direction. However, this field still lacks a comprehensive review and so developments of different branches are relatively independent. In this paper, we provide the first systematic review on the applications of deep generative models for offline policy learning. In particular, we cover five mainstream deep generative models, including Variational Auto-Encoders, Generative Adversarial Networks, Normalizing Flows, Transformers, and Diffusion Models, and their applications in both offline reinforcement learning (offline RL) and imitation learning (IL). Offline RL and IL are two main branches of offline policy learning and are widely-adopted techniques for sequential decision-making. Notably, for each type of DGM-based offline policy learning, we distill its fundamental scheme, categorize related works based on the usage of the DGM, and sort out the development process of algorithms in that field. Subsequent to the main content, we provide in-depth discussions on deep generative models and offline policy learning as a summary, based on which we present our perspectives on future research directions. This work offers a hands-on reference for the research progress in deep generative models for offline policy learning, and aims to inspire improved DGM-based offline RL or IL algorithms. For convenience, we maintain a paper list on https://github.com/LucasCJYSDL/DGMs-for-Offline-Policy-Learning.